Makes sense to me Mike, we all know fish have an acute sense of smell or whatever to detect food , so why couldn't they pick up on are scent and be put off..
That is properly interesting Gaz! Have obviously heard multiple people suggest how bad it is to overly handle baits over the years, but there is obviously very little, even semi-scientific data around.An old college mate and myself had this discussion a few years ago, which led to me writing my final year dissertation on this subject. The experiments that i carried out with Carp, showed that there was no significant difference in bait selection between a handeled and non handeled bait. Although it is only one short study, my opinion is that it really dosn't make much difference at all.
Yeah it interested me, trying to prove or disprove an age old myths. There is very little scientific data on this subject, and although my dissertation showed no difference, many more studies would need to be carried out to suport my findings.That is properly interesting Gaz! Have obviously heard multiple people suggest how bad it is to overly handle baits over the years, but there is obviously very little, even semi-scientific data around.
If you think thats bad me and my mate used to fish a lily covered lake for pike years ago and our best ever lure was an 8 inch, inch wide piece of stick off the floor with a weedless single hook electrical taped to the back of it.. no moving weight system but cast like a bullet!I mean, Liquorice FFS! :|
I firmly believe it.Sounds reasonable Mike. Keith was saying about 'old' SPs doing less catching.
If retrieving a lure, I don't think it matters so much IF the attraction is reactive and visual. However: slow it down, leaving a scent trail and I think it does.Mike, perhaps with the sented lures eg Xlayers. Not with all as George and I have been doing good with some "old" Fin-S fish lures that have been used on a bunch of trips...
Paul uses them all the time now. He has a wheelbarrow full and it certainly hasn't hurt his catch rate.Mike
I think it depends on the SPs?
Some SPs are salt impregnated and give off scent for a long time. Others are coated with scent and lose it relatively quickly.
I have seen the "new SP fishes best " theory in practice and it seems to hold water. But you can get lots and lots of scents nowadays, I use them now and then and they can make a difference.
My tip would be to always keep SPs in the bag they came in. It seems to help them keep their scent better than moving them to a SP proof box.
No, very true. However, there is no scientific data regards God yet millions still abide by the existence of such things. It's about gut feeling and faith. I often don't question inbuilt instincts.That is properly interesting Gaz! Have obviously heard multiple people suggest how bad it is to overly handle baits over the years, but there is obviously very little, even semi-scientific data around.
Me too. Results seem to confirm it.Saying all that though i do try to handle my sp's as little as possible and make sure I always have the bags sealed etc etc, also am definitely a firm believer in the fresh x - layer!
Cheers
Enter the world of LRF and HRF which relies on that fact.Fish don't have fingers, all they can do is suck it and see by which time it's often too late.