Thanks for the effort Keith. I look forward to your findings.
Do you think that 3-14g or 5-20g would be more like MRF.
I'm not sure what the difference is really, but what I'm thinking of doing is targeting the mackerel with 2 inch white soft plastics that imitate the white bait fry, if that makes any difference.
I'm not sure if we get wrasse locally, as the Kent coast is not very rocky - mostly shingle, sand or mud. I think that we get pouting and whiting, so I wouldn't mind trying for them too. I don't know if this would make a difference to the kit needed. I was concentrating on the lure weight. Maybe I should start a different thread - i might be going off at a tangent.
Thanks anyway,
Tony.
It's not just about rod length / weight and rating. I wish it were.
It's about finding a rod that transmits the bite (tap or whatever) to the user whilst at the same time being lightweight, responsive, has an action that will protect light braids or fluorocarbons and....is strong enough.
It's a tall order in a 2 pc rod.
Actually:
a 3 or 4 pc very fast actioned fly rod blank might be close.
I'm quite interested in this because I might want to travel myself with such a rod.
under 7g is LRF but a rod rated say...1 - 9 would still be LRF.
5 - 15 might be MRF but again, 3.5 - 14 would be in the bracket.
HRF could be 5 -28, 3.5 - 21 etc. It's more about the taper and the ability to be sensitive but still stop big fish in rough ground.